From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to navigation Jump to search
WikiProject Disambiguation  
WikiProject iconThis page is within the scope of WikiProject Disambiguation, an attempt to structure and organize all disambiguation pages on Wikipedia. If you wish to help, you can edit the page attached to this talk page, or visit the project page, where you can join the project or contribute to the discussion.


from VfD:

A bit of techie trivia that probably belongs (if this level of detail is appropriate) in some article about Intel processors. It's basically Intel's own name for a hardware/microcode release number. --[[User:Tony Sidaway|Tony Sidaway|Talk]] 02:15, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)

  • Keep and expand. --Randy 02:30, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep. I tried to edit this page to add a serious, alternative definition of stepping. Mind you, we may need a disambiguation page. —ExplorerCDT 02:35, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Probably a disambig--stepping is also a form of dance (or at least we had a stepping team at my high school). [[User:Meelar|Meelar (talk)]] 05:26, Dec 6, 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep it. —[[User:Radman1|RaD Man (talk)]] 08:45, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep ExplorerCDT version. Remove, or better, move other stuff into Intel article. Indeed probably a disambiguation page will rise. --Gtabary 12:59, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
    • That version was only tongue-in-cheek, and I got flak for it...some schmuck tried to have me banned. Even the line that was taken out: "Monopedal organisms often experience difficulty in stepping." But thank you anyway. —ExplorerCDT 15:31, 6 Dec 2004 (UTC)
      • I removed that line, and I found it very funny. Actually, I appreciated the whole article, which is why I reposted that version on BJAODN before cleaning it up. --L33tminion | (talk) 21:13, Dec 7, 2004 (UTC)
        • Where'd you put that on BJAODN? That was one of the reasons I edited the article as I did. Though adding the how-to-walk approach was more than half-serious, all the time I was working on it I was thinking..."this will be on BJAODN eventually." —ExplorerCDT 05:11, 8 Dec 2004 (UTC)
      • "Tongue-in-cheek" entries are considered vandalism. Referring to someone as a "schmuck" violates our "No personal attacks" policy. A sense of humour is admirable, as is boldness; please channel it a bit more appropriately. --jpgordon∇∆∇∆ 16:43, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
        • Now you're just becoming harassive, jpgordon. That gripes me even more —ExplorerCDT 18:34, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)
  • Keep and disambiguate. This rule of avoiding personal attacks should also include petty attacks and nitpicking. [[User:GRider|GRider\talk]] 20:02, 7 Dec 2004 (UTC)

end moved discussion